FINALIST FOR THE PULITZER PRIZE FINALIST FOR THE PEN/FAULKNER AWARD WINNER OF THE WHITING AWARD WINNER OF THE SAROYAN INTERNATIONAL PRIZE FOR WRITING WINNTER OF THE VCU CABELL FIRST NOVELIST AWARD WINNER OF THE NEW AMERICAN VOICES AWARD A PUBLISHERS WEEKLY TOP 10 BOOK OF THE YEAR The first novel by the Pulitzer Prize–winning author of Trust , an exquisite and blisteringly intelligent story of a young Swedish boy, separated from his brother, who becomes a legend and an outlaw A young Swedish immigrant finds himself penniless and alone in California. The boy travels east in search of his brot her, moving on foot against the great current of emigrants pushing west. Driven back again and again, he meets criminals, naturalists, religious fanatics, swindlers, American Indians, and lawmen, and his exploits turn him into a legend. Diaz defies the conventions of historical fiction and genre, offering a probing look at the stereotypes that populate our past and a portrait of radical foreignness.
Bewertungen & Erfahrungen
4,0 von 5
3 Bewertungen
5 ★0
4 ★3
3 ★0
2 ★0
1 ★0
Verteilung basiert auf 3 vorliegenden Einzelbewertungen.
Wir bündeln Bewertungen aus verschiedenen Quellen
und geprüfte Nutzerbewertungen von testmonster.de, um dir ein ehrliches Gesamtbild zu geben.
Though the novel does not quite live up to the hype, it is a beautifully written tall tale. A lot of tension is created by the contrast between the poetic language and the realistically violent episodes set in the old West.
I liked this book - a good tale, a sort of left-field Western. It’s a bit surreal in parts, which some people didn’t like, but for me this gave it an interesting edge. I can see why it was a contender for a prize – for me four-star read.The four stars are for the author; the publisher gets zero stars after the mess they made of chapter 20. Whole chunks of text, in one case over half a page, are repeated word-for-word a few pages later, clearly the result of some careless cutting and pasting. Mine’s a paperback and I’m told the Kindle version’s the same so the bug’s probably in the master manuscript. So the proofreaders (if there were any) didn’t read it properly and neither did the Pulitzer nor the Pen/Faulkner judges. Schocking.
Deine Bewertung *
0/2000
Bewertungen werden nach Prüfung veröffentlicht. Bitte bleibe sachlich und fair.
* Alle Preise inkl. MwSt., ggf. zzgl. Versandkosten. Preise und Verfügbarkeit können sich seit der letzten Aktualisierung geändert haben.
Beim Klick auf „Zum Angebot" oder „Zum Shop" verlässt du testmonster.de und wirst zum jeweiligen Händler weitergeleitet.
testmonster.de erhält ggf. eine Provision — für dich entstehen keine Mehrkosten.
Letzte Aktualisierung: 12.05.2026 19:39 Uhr.